HomeWorldCan We Balance Sustainability and Global Food Security Without Sacrificing the Planet?

Can We Balance Sustainability and Global Food Security Without Sacrificing the Planet?

Published on

Article NLP Indicators
Sentiment -0.30
Objectivity 0.70
Sensitivity 0.20

A recent study applied the MIT Integrated Global System Modeling (IGSM) framework to evaluate land-based climate mitigation options. The research found that with transformative changes, global land can provide a sustainable supply of food and ecosystem services while reducing greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with the 1.5°C goal.

Background

Capping global warming at 1.5°C requires a massive reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, as well as a substantial reallocation of land to support that effort and sustain the biosphere. More land will be needed to accommodate a growing demand for bioenergy and nature-based carbon sequestration while ensuring sufficient acreage for food production and ecological sustainability.

DOCUMENT GRAPH | Entities, Sentiment, Relationship and Importance
You can zoom and interact with the network

Study Findings

The study applied the MIT Integrated Global System Modeling (IGSM) framework to evaluate costs and benefits of different land-based climate mitigation options in Sky2050, a 1.5°C climate-stabilization scenario developed by Shell. The research team used the global hectare (gha) as the standard unit of measurement.

Key Results

  • With transformative changes in policy, land management practices, and consumption patterns, global land is sufficient to provide a sustainable supply of food and ecosystem services throughout this century while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with the 1.5°C goal.

  • If such changes are implemented, 2.5–3.5 gha of land would be used for nature-based solutions (NBS) practices to sequester 3–6 gigatonnes (Gt) of CO2 per year, and 0.4–0.6 gha of land would be allocated for energy production – 0.2–0.3 gha for bioenergy and 0.2–0.35 gha for wind and solar power generation.

Conclusion

The study’s lead author, Angelo Gurgel, emphasizes the importance of effective policies at national and global levels to support a 1.5°C future. These policies must promote efficient use of land for food, energy, and nature while being supported by long-term commitments from government and industry decision-makers.

Related Links

SOURCES
The above article was written based on the content from the following sources.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

The content on this website is generated by artificial intelligence (AI) and is provided for experimental purposes only.

While we strive for accuracy, the AI-generated articles may contain errors, inaccuracies, or outdated information.We encourage users to independently verify any information before making decisions based on the content.

The website and its creators assume no responsibility for any actions taken based on the information provided.
Use the content at your own discretion.

AI Writer
AI Writer
AI-Writer is a cutting-edge content AI LLM-Powered Agent Article Creator. It specializes in transforming complex topics into clear, accessible information. Whether it’s tech, business, or lifestyle, AI-Writer consistently delivers insightful, data-driven content tailored to readers' needs.

Latest articles

Google’s UK Leader Discusses AI – A New Era for Innovation and Growth

Google’s UK boss, Debbie Weinstein, is...

Scottish Sikh Community Shines at the Turner Prize through Innovative Art

Glasgow-based artist Jasleen Kaur wins this...

More like this

French PM Hints at Possible Survival in No-Confidence Vote

French Prime Minister Michel Barnier is...

Google’s UK Leader Discusses AI – A New Era for Innovation and Growth

Google’s UK boss, Debbie Weinstein, is...

TikTok Unveils its First Awards Ceremony: A Night of Celestial Talent

Oxford University has chosen ‘brain rot’...